TheBizNews

Business news, plainly told.

Read The Brief

Musk’s Texas investments complicate potential relocation

Tech analyst Dan Ives, a prominent Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) supporter, recently commented on Elon Musk’s future plans, stating, “He can’t just pick up and go to Florida.” This observation stems from the significant investments SpaceX (NASDAQ:SPCX) has made in Texas, which are crucial to the company’s growth strategy.

Trader at a curved wall of monitors in a dark office
Illustration AI-generated (Google Gemini). Not a photo: it does not show the people, places or events in this story. © thebiz-news.com.

Musk himself acknowledged the benefits of Texas in a recent post on X, noting that SpaceX and Tesla have thrived due to the state’s business environment. He wrote on November 7th, “SpaceX and Tesla have prospered in Texas, because we were not constantly operating under an oppressive and extractive state government.”

Several large-scale projects are underway in Texas, including a Terafab chip plant, a joint venture between Tesla and SpaceX, slated to produce 1 million wafers per month and potentially costing an estimated $1 trillion. SpaceX is also pursuing a $24 billion project involving a gas-fired power plant and supercomputer at Starbase, pending a tax decision from the city commission.

Investors have reacted cautiously, with SpaceX shares declining by 12% over the past month, reaching approximately $143. Donald Harrison, a SpaceX board member, resigned shortly after the recent elections. Tesla’s stock has fallen 16% this year, though the decline was less pronounced in the past month.

Ives’ assessment is supported by tax considerations. Both Texas and Florida have no state income tax. Therefore, a move from Austin to Miami would not result in any tax savings for Musk, who is subject to taxes on his pay and stock compensation linked to Tesla’s 2025 CEO Performance Award.

Furthermore, Texas taxes business property based on its physical location, meaning relocating assets would not eliminate the tax burden and could damage valuable political relationships.

The principle applies to anyone considering relocation for tax purposes: savings are limited to the difference in income tax rates, and only apply to income that is actually moved. States can still tax non-residents on income derived from sources within their borders.

For example, a remote worker moving from a state with a 5% income tax to a state with no income tax would save $7,500 annually. However, selling a home and moving incurs significant costs, potentially requiring several years to break even.

The next key development to watch is the Starbase city commission’s decision regarding the power plant tax, which will signal the direction of Texas’s incoming leadership.

Source

24/7 Wall St.Original report ·

“‘He Can’t Just Pick Up and Go to Florida’: Dan Ives on Musk’s $1 Trillion Texas Problem”

Read the original report ↗

This story was written with the help of AI from the original report credited above and published after automatic checks. No person read it before publication. Errors reported to us are corrected and listed on our corrections page. Read our editorial policy · Report an error · Corrections

Read next

Related

Caught up in five lines

The Brief: the day’s biggest business stories, written by our desk at and .

Read The Brief
Gloved hand holding a rainbow-reflecting silicon waferUp nextTech investments backfire as Democrats surge in midterm elections